lol! frank, if you added up all of the bandwidth that has been "wasted" by signature lines over the years, and compared it to the bandwidth that has been "wasted" by this thread, this thread would probably already have "wasted" more! lol...
tan. -----Original Message----- From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 24 March 2004 10:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Signature lines I'll get rid of mine right away. Next post, it goes. Promise. cheers, frank ps: speaking of wastes of bandwidth, how about this thread? This isn't 1982, guys. "Wasting bandwidth". Geez, gimme a break! -f "The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer >From: John Forbes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Signature lines >Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 23:33:30 -0000 > >Hear, hear! The only ones that work are simple factual statements about, >or descriptions, of the poster. Cotty's is an example. All the rest are a >pain. Even the cleverest ones quickly lose their impact, and become >irritating. Most are simply pretentious, and a few are beneath contempt. > >John > > >On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 15:29:20 -0500, Daniel J. Matyola ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>IMHO, all signature lines, whether politically inflamatory or just >>"cutsie," >>are to be avoided on a list such as this as an unnecessary waste of >>bandwidth. >> >> > > > >-- >Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ > _________________________________________________________________ STOP MORE SPAM with the MSN Premium and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=htt p://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines
