On 6 Apr 2001, at 10:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> He studied the prints, then examined the negatives. "There was nothing
> wrong with the scans," he explained. "Look at your negatives. That's how
> bad the color was, because of your lengthy exposures. (Typically, my
> exposures were 8 to 29 seconds.) Your prints look so good because we took
> the trouble to correct them."
Hi Paul,
Your lab guy (or his digital equipment) is useless (on the digital side), I say
this as I have never had a neg scan that I couldn't match to a print, in fact I
would suggest that there is more correction available on the digital side (if
the scan is properly executed of course).
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
Fax +61-2-9554-9259
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications.html
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
