Herb, what are the differences you have observed with the 14 bit scanning and the 4X oversampling? I was just pondering the 16 bit issue today and haven't come up with anything yet.
Kenneth Waller ----- Original Message ----- From: "Herb Chong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 9:28 PM Subject: Re: OT Scanning images (was Different films, different results) > Ken, i find Digital ICE saves a huge amount of time retouching. i also scan > in 14-bit/channel mode and enable 4X oversampling. i use autoexposure and > autofocus. everything else is set to default, no adjustment, position so > that i can work with the image in Photoshop. > > Herb.... > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Kenneth Waller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 9:18 PM > Subject: Re: OT Scanning images (was Different films, different results) > > > > Funny this should come up now, but I just got my Super Coolscan 4000 up > and > > running (after sitting in the box for over a year). The hardest part was > > installing the correct software for the operating system. I've scanned 40 > > Velvia slides and am totally happy with the results. These were all well > > exposed images, so all I am doing in the scan is auto focus, minimal crop > > and I get just great 54mb files. > >
