Hi!
It took me some time until I got to the Frank's message and some
others. You know, I am at work with cup of good green tea after lunch.
Most of my e-mail is by now at my home PC... Anyway.
Here is my opinion.
I think Frank does a tremendous job and puts to this a lot, like a
real lot, of effort into it. It would be a great shame if he would be
put down or discouraged because of some of his comments. You know, at
times I don't agree with him and with other people who comments on
PAWs. But that's natural, isn't it? I humbly and personally think that
Frank is one of the most pleasant people to be in disagreement with.
If you know what I mean <g>.
Anyway, personally, I try to comment on as many PAWs as I possibly
can. Still I try to adhere to a rule that if I don't quite like some
image and I cannot really point out what is wrong or suggest how to
improve it, then I normally don't say a word. However, the level of
PDML PAW is considerably higher than your average photo sharing web
site. So I am trying very hard to still comment as much as I can.
Though I am not saying that I never broke that rule <g>...
It would be a huge shame if such talks would pop up like this one did.
Let us have fun, not flame wars...
Just my cents...
Boris
- Re: Criticism - was PAW: Dinosaur, too Eactivist
- Re: Criticism - was PAW: Dinosaur, too Boris Liberman
- Re: Criticism - was PAW: Dinosaur, too Eactivist
- Re: Criticism - was PAW: Dinosaur, too Keith Whaley
- Re: Criticism - was PAW: Dinosaur, too Treena
- Re: Criticism - was PAW: Dinosaur, too John Forbes
- Re: Criticism - was PAW: Dinosaur, too Cotty
- Re: Criticism - was PAW: Dinosaur, too frank theriault
- Re: Criticism - was PAW: Dinosaur, too William Robb
- PAW: Right angle scope Jens Bladt
- Re: PAW: Right angle scope Frits W�thrich
- SV: PAW: Right angle scope Jens Bladt

