The sensor on it is huge compaired to a 2mp P&S, so the signal to noise ratio should be a lot better. Also 2mp is entirely adiquate for web use, or 4x6 prints. It also uses Pentax K lenses, that is worth something to us here on the list.
You know what? If it turns out to be any good at all, I probably could, with a lot of effort, scrape up 300 bucks. Wonder if it will be available over here.
--
Boros Attila wrote:
z> http://dp-now.com/archives/000691a.html
z> Don't you just love the RAW format;
z> .RUS
z> Regards,
z> Ziggy
1.92 million pixels effective CCD. Why one bothers making such a low resolution DSLR? There are dozens of P&S which are far better. It cannont yield good quality prints.
Attila
-- graywolf http://graywolfphoto.com/graywolf.html
