is this typical for *istd? i remeber vaguesly a discussion of dead/hot pixels on *istd some time ago, but don't remember what the outcome was. 15 bad pixels sounds like quite a few to me.
mishka
Rob Studdert wrote:
Using the above method my results were as follows:
[DeadPixelText] Version=1.0 Description= FileType=TIFF NumBadPixels=15 0=Hot,2798,135,69 1=Hot,1954,339,113 2=Hot,1809,585,64 3=Hot,726,610,112 4=Hot,726,611,192 5=Hot,726,612,112 6=Hot,2312,753,121 7=Hot,323,766,94 8=Hot,572,1365,116 9=Hot,1627,1400,64 10=Hot,2163,1958,96 11=Hot,2162,1959,113 12=Hot,2163,1959,145 13=Hot,2164,1959,112 14=Hot,2163,1960,98
From what I have seen of other results this is pretty average.
I will make an effort to tabulate all the results that I have received to date and I will put up a page in the next day or two.
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
