Please don't copy the entire digest if you want to post on this list. You can only subscribe, there is no way to unsubscribe. Da's nou toch jammer.
On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 12:33, Arjo Sinon wrote: > Op 7-apr-04 om 12:25 heeft [EMAIL PROTECTED] het > volgende geschreven: > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Content-Type: text/plain > > > > pentax-discuss-d Digest Volume 04 : Issue 779 > > > > Today's Topics: > > Re: PAW - Man in Bakery [ Boris Liberman > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > > Re: PAW - Reflections on Golden Pond [ Boris Liberman > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > > RE: PAW - Man in Bakery [ "Jens Bladt" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] > > TESTING MY LX METER [ "John Daniele" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] > > Re: PAW: tiger [ David Mann > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > > OT: Book - Ansel Adams in Color [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] > > Re: PAW: tiger [ "Boris Liberman" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] > > Re: I'm back...with new pics [ Boros Attila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > ] > > Re: I'm back...with new pics [ Shel Belinkoff > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] > > Re[2]: I'm back...with new pics [ Boros Attila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > ] > > RE: Re[2]: I'm back...with new pics [ "Antti-Pekka Virjonen" > > <antti-pekka ] > > Re: I'm back...with new pics [ John Forbes > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] > > Re: Sigma 20 mm. f1.8 EX DG AF [ Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > > Re: I'm back...with new pics [ Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > > Re: I'm back...with new pics [ Paul Stenquist > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 06:52:46 +0200 > > From: Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: PAW - Man in Bakery > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > > > Hi! > > > > SB> BTW, this took place just before Passover a couple of years ago, > > and we > > SB> enjoyed some nice pastry and rich, dark coffee. Mmmm ... this pic > > brings > > SB> up some pleasant memories of those hours ;-)) Good food, good > > coffee, > > SB> good conversation, a nice walk through the tree-lined streets of > > an old > > SB> berkeley neighborhood afterwards. > > > > Happy Passover, Shel, and all the rest to whom this applies and who > > celebrates this holiday. > > > > Shel, I can almost totally relate to that. Been to Berkeley myself > > once in good old 2001. There was this excellent tea and coffee shop > > where we bought some quality tea, leaves of course, and later had a > > good cup of tea with our friends. > > > > As I said, happy holidays <g>. > > > > Boris > > ([EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 06:56:23 +0200 > > From: Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: PAW - Reflections on Golden Pond - Week of April 5 > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > > > Hi! > > > > Ken, this is beautiful. You know, if I could I would print it real > > big, hang it above my computer at work and use it for moments of > > relaxation. It should be very relaxing to one's tired eyes... > > > > There is a little round bright patch that almost begs to be removed > > and replaced by something brown-yellow background-like. > > > > Truly excellent! > > > > Boris > > ([EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 07:41:50 +0200 > > From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: RE: PAW - Man in Bakery > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Content-Type: text/plain; > > charset="us-ascii" > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > > > Very good photograph. It tels a story and it's "life confirming". I > > like it. > > All the best > > Jens > > > > > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt > > > > > > -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- > > Fra: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sendt: 5. april 2004 16:31 > > Til: PDML > > Emne: PAW - Man in Bakery > > > > > > I posted this to the Leica forum the other day ... > > > > http://www.leica-camera.com/discus_e/messages/11/57643.html?1081108064 > > > > shel > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 01:56:49 -0400 > > From: "John Daniele" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: TESTING MY LX METER > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Content-Type: text/plain; > > charset="US-ASCII" > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > > > Hi all. I was testing my meter on a recently CLA'd LX and came up with > > an odd shot I wanted to share. > > > > I was at the Boston museum of science by the window and set my camera > > down on a rail and while holding it still shot this on AUTO with a M50 > > f1.4 > > > > However my hand moved so with the shutter open I covered the lens and > > paned right and pointed at an interesting sculpture I found the results > > to be interesting for two reasons, one the wonderful ability of the LX > > and two I developed this in tetnal in my backhouse. > > > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2267463 > > > > The second shot here is when my hand did not move. The position of the > > rail and the fact it was not flat made for lousy framing but my goal > > here was to just see > > the capability of the camera in auto mode. > > > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2267460 > > > > Just thought I would share ho much I LOVE MY LX > > > > Regards JD > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 17:58:26 +1200 > > From: David Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: PAW: tiger > > Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > > > On Apr 7, 2004, at 05:32, Boris Liberman wrote: > > > >> Dan, as for the tiger. I must say, honestly and respectfully, that > >> blown out highlights make no good to this image. I am not as worried > >> by the eyes as Shel seems to be, but highlights distract me. > > > > As far as I'm concerned any photo of a cat is art. Any photo of a > > tiger is fine art. > > > > <g> > > > > - Dave > > > > http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/ > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 02:06:42 EDT > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: OT: Book - Ansel Adams in Color > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > > > Back, oh, I don't know, six to eight months ago or longer, when we were > > having a list "discussion" about B&W v.s. color, someone, Herb I > > think, mentioned > > that Ansel Adams also did color. Which was news to me. And that he > > thought his > > color shots equaled and actually rivaled his B&W shots. > > > > Well, just got "Ansel Adams in Color," used from Amazon. And I would > > have to > > agree. Beautiful. So I am just mentioning it, if you can get a hold of > > the > > book, or run across it sometime, it is well worth a look. > > > > Marnie aka Doe I am proud of me. Just upgraded, successfully, XP > > over Me > > (not a clean install). Bit of a b____ to do, but it works now. > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 10:15:01 +0400 > > From: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: PAW: tiger > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251"; format="flowed" > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > > > > Hi! > > > >> As far as I'm concerned any photo of a cat is art. Any photo of a > >> tiger is fine art. > >> > >> <g> > > > > Dave, what about cheetah and lion then? <bg> > > > > Boris > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 09:53:39 +0300 > > From: Boros Attila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: I'm back...with new pics > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > > > Hello Paul, > > > > Wednesday, April 7, 2004, 3:34:17 AM, you wrote: > > > > PS> Hi folks, > > PS> I'm back from my work trip to LA. Since I was off list for more > > than > > PS> two weeks, I think I ought to show three PAWs. > > Wellcome back Paul, it sounds you had a nice trip. So these photos are > > some sort of presentation of LA? > > > > PS> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2266882&size=lg > > Very nice shot, makes me want to go out hiking:) Unfortunately the > > weather is very rainy here. > > > > PS> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2249276&size=lg > > Beautiful girl, but the cropped head is a bit distracting. > > > > PS> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2266884&size=lg > > This is simply amazing. I don't understand why you used manual focus > > and how could you get the water that sharp. For me that part is that > > makes this photo, it feels like the surfer is 'cutting' the water. > > > > Attila > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 00:48:24 -0700 > > From: Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: I'm back...with new pics > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > > > <LOL> I don't think her head is at all relevant to the > > photo. Gives a new meaning to getting one's draws into a > > knot <ROTFLMAO> > > > > Boros Attila wrote: > > > >> PS> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2249276&size=lg > >> Beautiful girl, but the cropped head is a bit distracting. > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 11:12:46 +0300 > > From: Boros Attila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re[2]: I'm back...with new pics > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > > > Hello Shel, > > > > It is obviously not her head is the point of interest, but I think it > > can't be just ignored. Her hair also looks nice. I like the photo but > > I think a full length shot would be even better. > > > > Attila > > > > Wednesday, April 7, 2004, 10:48:24 AM, you wrote: > > > > SB> <LOL> I don't think her head is at all relevant to the > > SB> photo. Gives a new meaning to getting one's draws into a > > SB> knot <ROTFLMAO> > > > > SB> Boros Attila wrote: > > > >>> PS> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2249276&size=lg > >>> Beautiful girl, but the cropped head is a bit distracting. > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 11:32:59 +0300 > > From: "Antti-Pekka Virjonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: RE: Re[2]: I'm back...with new pics > > Message-ID: > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > content-class: urn:content-classes:message > > Content-Type: text/plain; > > charset="us-ascii" > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > > > > Nice bag... and the girl ain't bad either :-) > > > > Antti-Pekka > > > > --- > > Antti-Pekka Virjonen > > Computec Oy, Turku Finland > > Gsm: +358-500-789 753 > > > > www.computec.fi * www.estera.fi > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Boros Attila [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 11:13 AM > >> To: Shel Belinkoff > >> Subject: Re[2]: I'm back...with new pics > >> > >> Hello Shel, > >> > >> It is obviously not her head is the point of interest, but I think > >> it > >> can't be just ignored. Her hair also looks nice. I like the photo > >> but > >> I think a full length shot would be even better. > >> > >> Attila > >> > >> Wednesday, April 7, 2004, 10:48:24 AM, you wrote: > >> > >> SB> <LOL> I don't think her head is at all relevant to the > >> SB> photo. Gives a new meaning to getting one's draws into a > >> SB> knot <ROTFLMAO> > >> > >> SB> Boros Attila wrote: > >> > >>>> PS> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2249276&size=lg > >>>> Beautiful girl, but the cropped head is a bit distracting. > >> > >> > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 09:47:20 +0100 > > From: John Forbes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: I'm back...with new pics > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-15 > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > > > > I really like the composition of the canyon shot, and the fact that you > > have chosen a time of day when the light has been just right to show > > detail in the shadows without overwhelming the highlights. > > > > The beach shot appeals for primarily non-photographic reasons, and I > > never > > noticed the cut-off head! > > > > The texture, if that is the right word, of the water is fantastic in > > the > > third shot. On my laptop monitor the picture slightly lacks punch. > > The > > black isn't quite black enough. I'll have to try it on a CRT. > > > > John > > > > On Tue, 6 Apr 2004 20:34:17 -0400, Paul Stenquist > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Hi folks, > >> I'm back from my work trip to LA. Since I was off list for more than > >> two > >> weeks, I think I ought to show three PAWs. I shot a lot of frames, > >> somewhere around 700. i like these three. They're very California. It > >> wasn't the most work intensive production I've ever been on, so I had > >> my > >> share of fun. Two canyon hikes, numerous trips to the beach, and lots > >> of > >> walks around town in Santa Monica. My old pal "Santa Monica Jesus" was > >> on his street corner, but I didn't run across him when I had my > >> camera. > >> Would have liked to update my shots of him. Next time. > >> Paul > >> > >> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2266882&size=lg > >> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2249276&size=lg > >> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2266884&size=lg > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 10:16:01 +0100 > > From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "pentax list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: Sigma 20 mm. f1.8 EX DG AF > > Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > > > On 6/4/04, JOE discumbobulated: > > > >> Does anyone have this? If so, what are your impressions? > > > > I have the 24mm f1.8 EX DG AF macro - I use it on a D60 as a street > > lens > > sometimes - the macro facility is very good. I haven't used this on a > > film body so don't know what it's like at the edge of the frame. It > > crops > > in to about 38mm on the D60. The build quality is not up to Pentax > > standards, nor Canon's for that matter. I find the focus ring, with its > > clutch-type push/pull affair flimsy, and I'm not a big fan of Smegma > > lenses. I have the 70-200 2.8 which is much better, but still not my > > cupofteaearlgreyhot. The latter will soon be up for sale as I enter the > > heart-stopping realm of Canon L glass..... > > > >> > >> I need wide primes that are fast because I use them indoors. I am > >> afraid > >> that the DA 14 f2.8 won't cut it. The widest prime I've got is the FA > >> 24 > >> f2.0, but its aov on the *ist D isn't wide enough. > >> > >> I thought about the Mir 20 mm. f2.5, but it is so thick at the rear > >> that > >> it may not fit under the *ist D's prism. > > > > I'm sure the Sigma will be fine, glass-wise - AFAIK it gets good write- > > ups. I would, however, heavily advise that you handle this lens before > > buying. If you like what you feel, then go for it! > > > > HTH > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > Cotty > > > > > > ___/\__ > > || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche > > ||=====| www.macads.co.uk/snaps > > _____________________________ > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 10:26:01 +0100 > > From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "pentax list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: I'm back...with new pics > > Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > > > On 6/4/04, MY KINDA GUY discumbobulated: > > > >> Hi folks, > >> I'm back from my work trip to LA. Since I was off list for more than > >> two weeks, I think I ought to show three PAWs. I shot a lot of frames, > >> somewhere around 700. i like these three. They're very California. It > >> wasn't the most work intensive production I've ever been on, so I had > >> my share of fun. Two canyon hikes, numerous trips to the beach, and > >> lots of walks around town in Santa Monica. My old pal "Santa Monica > >> Jesus" was on his street corner, but I didn't run across him when I > >> had > >> my camera. Would have liked to update my shots of him. Next time. > >> Paul > > > > Looks like you had a great time Paul. > > > > Canyon and surfer are excellent - like the surfer a lot. > > > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2249276&size=lg > > > > Forget 'Street', I'm shooting 'Beach' from now on. > > > > > > Cheers, > > Cotty > > > > > > ___/\__ > > || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche > > ||=====| www.macads.co.uk/snaps > > _____________________________ > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 06:22:46 -0400 > > From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: I'm back...with new pics > > Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > > > On Apr 7, 2004, at 2:53 AM, Boros Attila wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> PS> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2266884&size=lg > >> This is simply amazing. I don't understand why you used manual focus > >> and how could you get the water that sharp. For me that part is that > >> makes this photo, it feels like the surfer is 'cutting' the water. > >> > >> Attila > >> > >> > > Thanks Attila. I used manual focus because my lens is an a 400/5.6. I > > don't own a really long autofocus lens. But I've shot lots of > > motorsports with long manual focus lenses. I don't consider MF to be a > > disadvantage, and in many cases, it can be an advantage. The human hand > > an eye are probably faster than most autofocus mechanisms. > > > > -------------------------------- > > End of pentax-discuss-d Digest V04 Issue #779 > > ********************************************* > > -- Frits W�thrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
