Though recently, as I will be a new father in a few weeks, cringe at the thought of having to shoot and print pics... surely there MUST be an easier way even if the numbers don't crunch properly??? The Coolpix does well with relatively stationary objects or those that move in a single plane of distance from the shooter; once things start moving, I wish it had the focus speed of a proper SLR which got me thinking about the MZ-S (digital)... Guess I will have to make do with my brother's Canon when he's not looking... Cheers. > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (pentax-discuss-digest) > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 04:30:44 -0400 (EDT) > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: pentax-discuss-digest V1 #564 > > Now, if digital photography was a work tool for me, of course I would > choose to adopt early, even if that meant paying through the nose. But work > tools are an ordinary cost of business, and should be justified on > the basis of their return on investment. In that scenario, were I a working > paid photog, I would crunch the numbers to see if it made sense to invest in > a digital SLR, even if that was instead of, or in addition to, my > Pentax gear. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
