Nick Clark wrote: > I find I still enjoy film more despite all the advantages of > digital. It's something about the MZ-S which I find > ergonomically superior to the *ist-D, although that could be > because I'm not yet used to the latter. I haven't yet got the > lenses for the 1.5 multiplier sorted out yet - I prefer > primes but haven't found a comfortable set yet.
I have yet to try an MZ-S and the more I read about this, the more keen I am to see for myself. The LX, for me so far, is by far and away the best camera I have ever used for size, weight and general ergonomics. I also prefer primes but I may well be in the minority with this opinion. Malcolm
