OK, thanks. So that means, when I combine your and my remarks, that auto on the *ist D works better then P-TTL and TTL.
I got the impression for a while it was only TTL that didn't work to well, but also P-TTL doesn't work very well. I really would like to see a firmware upgrade to address this shortcoming. Pentax, please, are you listening? On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 22:36, Bill Owens wrote: > Yep, that's what I was trying to say. Auto flash seems to be better and > more consistent than P-TTL. > > Bill > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Frits W�thrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 1:58 PM > Subject: Re: PENTAX *ist D : Things to improve > > > > auto is not TTL, and using my Metz 40MZ-2 with TTL doesn't work as well > > on the *ist D as it does on the PZ-1. Also using the flash on auto with > > the *ist D works better then with TTL. Or were you trying to say the > > same thing? > > > > On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 15:11, Bill Owens wrote: > > > > 1. TTL Flash is not so hot (I use a 500, but maybe the 360 is a lot > > > > better). > > > > > > I'm afraid not. My 360 set on auto and my OLD Metz CT45 on auto both > seem > > > to work better on auto than the 360 on P-TTL. > > > > > > Bill > > > > > -- > > Frits W�thrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > -- Frits W�thrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
