John
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 20:51:20 -0700, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It shouldn't ... I was just wondering aloud and asking a couple of questions (note the question marks), which, thus far, have gone unanswered.
Stan Halpin wrote:
So, how does that change Mark's comments in any way? It is nice to know that we can, hopefully, anticipate a quality lens, not one that panders to the bargain hunters.
Stan
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> Umm, isn't the DA 14/2.8 designed for digital cameras?
> Won't it be useless on standard frame 35mm cameras?
>
> Mark Roberts wrote:
>
>
>>In other words, this is going to be a top quality prime ultra-wide for
>>discriminating photographers rather than a cheap ultra-wide solution for
>>DSLR owners on a budget.
>
>
>
-- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
