...I wonder why they can't seem to cut off the flash light at the right
time?????. This isn't exactly new technology - at  least 20 years old.
Jens


>The nature of DSLR's
> in general seems to be weak TTL flash. I have heard the same
> complaint from both Nikon and Canon users.

Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt


-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: John Forbes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 19. april 2004 19:48
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: TTL flash with the *ist D


I agree.  I have the AF400FTZ and the AF240FT, and they are both hopeless
with the *ist D.  Sadly, the problem is not consistent, so you can't
reliably compensate for it.

What does work well, for me, is the AF240Z, which is a smallish dedicated,
non-TTL, flash with zoom, bounce and swivel.  It works fine when both
flash and camera are in program mode.

John

On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 08:58:41 -0600, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joseph Tainter"
> Subject: TTL flash with the *ist D
>
>
>
>> So...has anyone found a shoe-mounted flash that will do ordinary
> TTL
>> with the *ist D, at the full ISO range? I mean, one that works
> about
>> like it would on a 35 mm. body without glaring exposure problems.
>>
> The istD analogue TTL works more or less OK at ISO 400, not very well
> at 200, and I haven't tried it at faster speeds. The nature of DSLR's
> in general seems to be weak TTL flash. I have heard the same
> complaint from both Nikon and Canon users.
>
>>
>> Question 2:
>>
>> While I'm at it, what is everyone's experience with the rtf? I
> tried it
>> the other day, at ISO 400, with the SMC F 70-210, at -0.5 EV. It
> was a
>> portrait of my dog's face, taken from about 3 meters. Even with the
>> negative exposure compensation, I thought it was a bit overexposed,
>> though nothing that I couldn't correct in PS.
>
> The RTF will have the same acuracy weakness as the larger flash,
> without the range to go along with it. I haven't found it to be
> overly accurate. I think the best option is a dedicated, non TTL
> flash. I am thinking the AF 280T might be a good one to try.
>
> William Robb
>
>
>



--
Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/



Reply via email to