From: "Tom Reese" Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 1:51 AM
Subject: Re: WTB: TTL ringlight flash


"> Tanya spent too much time in the Outback and fried her brain then wrote:"

hehe, naah, you gotta have something to fry in the first place! ;-)

"> If I were you, I'd investigate this issue thoroughly before I bought one
for use with a digital
> body."

Can anyone else add to this?  Why would a ring light flash work any
differently than a normal flash?  I mean light is light is light, right?
(lol).  I am well aware of the TTL problems with the *ist D as you all know,
and I am not sure if I read it correctly, but the way Tom explains it, to
me, it reads that the ring light may have even worse TTL capabilities than a
normal flashgun such as the AF360fgz.  I am totally confused by this, can
anyone shed some light?

> Most ringlight flashes are made for macro photography and are
significantly
> underpowered for any working distance greater than a few feet. Make sure
> whatever you buy is packing enough power to do what you want it to do. You
> may decide that a shoe mounted flash and diffuser will be a better method
to
> get a similar effect.

Nope, tried it! I've never been able to recreate the effect using straight
hotshoe mounted flash guns.  The type of images that I am referring to all
have that tell tale giveaway circular shaped catch lights in the models
eyes!  I will mainly be shooting teens and kids for this shoot, so distance
really isn't that much of an issue.  I can really get in as close as I need
to.  The reason for me hoping for a higher guide number however is in order
to be able to overcome shadows from the sun.  The shoot will be outside, on
the beach, full sun in the middle of the day, so I will need all the power I
can get!

> I will have both the Phoenix and AF080C units with me at GFM. You're
welcome
> to try them with the *stD and see if they work for you. I know that
doesn't
> help you with your fashion shoot.

Nope, it won't, but even so, that is a wonderful offer Tom, and I would be
most excited to take you up on it! Thanks heaps!

tan.


Reply via email to