Markus, I'm not Shel, but I'm sure you won't mind another opinion.
What you need is not a change in lens lineup, but a second camera body loaded with an alternative film. Another film body won't cost much and they're getting cheaper all the time. Then you can use any combination you like, 100/400, 400/3200, b&w/colour, slide/neg, anything. If dust and damp isn't a problem you can just switch the one lens between bodies (to avoid lens duplication), leaving the other body lensless while you use the preferred film option of the moment. regards, Anthony Farr ----- Original Message ----- From: "Markus Maurer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hi Shel > I often use only a A70-210mm 4.0 zoom on the road and to be on the safe side > against shaking I shoot with a minimum of 1/125 or 1/250 or faster without > tripod . To get that under most light conditions, I need ISO 400 film, ISO > 100 would not work for me. > I can use a grey filter for small apertures in bright light, I too prefer a > small depth of field mostly. > I do not own fast tele/zoomlenses, so I see no other solution than fast film > for me. The only fast lens I have is the 50mm 1.2 from Pentax, all others > lenses are between 2.8 - 5.6 > > How do you solve that (analog?) dilemma, with a super fast (expensive) tele > or with a digital camera? > > saluti > Markus >
