I haven't exactly used the M 3.5 but I was happy with the K 3.5 until I picked up a K 2.3. Even
then it didn't seem too horribly slow especially by modern standards. Based on what I've read it
should be a more than acceptable optic.


Collin Brendemuehl wrote:

I picked one up yesterday @ Midwest.
It was interesting to look at the cast of the coatings.
It didn't have that more common rich amber case of the 50mm.
It was more of a mix of amber/blue/purple, more like the
43/1.9 or F50/1.7 (et. al.)

Who out there is happy with this lens?
I know it's a bit slow, but the price was right.

Collin






________________________________________________________________ Sent via the WebMail system at mail.safe-t.net












Reply via email to