Frankly, I find these differences overrated anyway. Maybe that is due to the fact that I am no professional - but then if I was one, I would hopefully be able to train myself enough to master the particular oddities of *any* (one) camera's user interface. I do find these differences interesting, sometimes amusing, part of the fun - but really nothing that would stop me using a camera.
What I find annoying is when the layout of a camera (combined with my own forgetfulness) leads to mistakes - like setting an exposure correction factor on an ME and not to reset it for the rest of the film. Or switching the *ist D to ISO 1600 and forget about it... I'd still say that compared to my other favourite brand (Rollei), Pentax cameras are very straightforward to use. Sven -----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- Von: Rob Studdert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. April 2004 19:23 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: AW: Stll confused *ist D On 22 Apr 2004 at 18:56, keller.schaefer wrote: > ... but don't let this stop you. A much as I like the elegant and simple > layout of the MZ-S - adjusting the aperture with the thumb-wheel (with an A or > FA lens mounted) also works very well. Not for all of us. Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
