Steven said: > I think I mentioned "pictures". It's a general term, like image, and > can refer to painting as well. It's fine in context, however. > > > Steven Desjardins > Department of Chemistry > Washington and Lee University > Lexington, VA 24450 > (540) 458-8873 > FAX: (540) 458-8878 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/23/04 10:31AM >>> > Steve said (at least, I think it was Steve, sorry if I'm wrong): > > We had a thread a while back where some objected to the use of > > "photographs" for digital. Since you gotta call'em somethin', the > word > > "image" has become handy. > > > > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/22/04 12:43PM >>> > > I hate using the word "images" instead of photographs, yet > > it's becoming so common that I find myself using it > > sometimes, and I REALLY dislike that! > > > Wot the heck is wrong with the good ol'fashioned term PICTURES? > > ERN >
You did, indeed! In a post that I saw just after I sent this one .... :-(
