Hi Henri - and welcome to the PDML.
The 2.5/135 is a K not an M. It's brilliant. I paid 100$+ for mine 6 months
ago!
The M 1.4 is - AFAI recall - excellent. (The SMC F 1.4/50 is one of the best
ever made anywhere).

Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt


-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: Henri Toivonen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 12. maj 2004 18:25
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: 50/1.4 and 135/2.5


Hello Pentax-people, this is the first post from me.

I found a couple of used lenses at a second hand store, and the prices
were really great.. atleast I think they were pretty nice.
So I'm wondering what comments you could give on these two, and if they
really are such bargains I think they are.

First off, a SMC-M 50mm f/1.4 for about $35
Second, a SMC-M 135mm f/2.5 for about $45 (Not the Takumar one)

Are these good lenses, and worthwhile buying?
I'm a poor student and rather not spend more money than necessary,
besides, i already have a couple of zoom lenses that cover this range (a
35-70mm and a 70-210mm).

Thanks in advance.

/Henri Toivonen



Reply via email to