Many of these suggestions depend on your personal work habits.  However,
I do think the ISO should be more easily displayed.  I have accidently
left the camera on higher settings.  It's odd for many of us to think of
ISO this way, but it's now another "on the fly" adjustable exposure
setting just like Tv and Av, and you certainly expect those to be
available all the time, without tuning a knob.  

The problem, of course is that sharpness, etc. are also available now,
and if you tried to show everything it would be ridiculous.  My only
literal point of comparison is the E-10, and I much prefer the *istD
interface.  I suspect, however, that even though I am currently
satisfied I could be shown an interface that I would like better with
some use.  I just find it a little hard to project beyond things that
actually annoy me, like the rocker switch.


Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/10/04 07:48PM >>>
On 11 May 2004 at 0:36, Nick Clark wrote:

> Meter mode is as it is indicated by which control wheel is active. I
didn't mean
> ISO, just that you don't have to count stops to get bsck to your
preferred
> metering mode.

True enough unless of course you've inadvertently bumped either thumb
wheel 
sending the camera into hyper mode, but hell a touch of the green
button will 
sort that. If I'm just selecting ISO I don't understand why we should
be forced 
to reset the program mode, I've never had to do this with any other
camera I've 
ever owned.

So yes there is a way around everything just like waking up the rear
screen 
which will show ISO and meter mode, but it could have been done better.
The MZ-
D did have a dedicated LCD on the rear showing ISO, whether it was
illuminated 
though I guess we'll never know.

Cheers,


Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ 
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998

Reply via email to