Cyril wrote:
> The 'one at the magazine' had nothing against Americans or any other people.
> He's just been told that somewhere on a list (PDML to be clear) people were
> asking questions about the relyability of the tests he performs every day.
> No one likes its said somewhere that his/her work is shit, and he did not
> like it.
But in light of the recent posting by Alin of another french lens test pasted here:
Wide open f/8 Uniformity(%) Light fall-off (EV)
FA* 85/1.4 ** *** 79 0.6
FA* 300/2.8 *** **** 93 0.5
FA* 300/4.5 *** *** 94 0.4
together with other tests that are in totall disagreement with CDI claims, isn't it
reasonable to question the tests (not only CDI) validity and reliabilty? Is it
reasonable to be pissed off when people question obvious discrepancies? CDI cannot
seriously mean that we should believe them and discard the rest including user reports
without any further explanation. I agree with those who claim that this could be
turned into an interesting discussion about undeniable discrepancies if CDI had wanted
to enlighten us.
Pål
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
