Oh God, no, not again. Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaargh!!!!!!!!
>Hi Peter, I dont want to get into a flame situation here, but I do not >think that I have ever heard of OSX being either hacked nor a problem >for developers. Can you support you statement with an example? >Certainly I do not think any OS is totally imune from a determined >hack, but all the information I have to date on the subject lead me to >beleive that OSX is about as stable and hack proof as they come. Is >there something I have been missing? Please say more. > >Antonio > >Antonio >On 17 May 2004, at 17:51, Peter J. Alling wrote: > >> Don't kid yourself, OS-X is based on a Unix version that's that's a >> hackers wet dream and a developers nightmare. >> >> Cotty wrote: >> >>> On 17/5/04, HENRI, discombobulated, offered: >>> >>> >>>> Substandard? Maybe that's the wrong word for it. Windows IS the >>>> standard for operating systems. However crappy it may be, it's still >>>> the standard. >>>> >>> >>> Gee it's nice to know that I use an above standard OS ;-) >>> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Cotty >>> >>> >>> ___/\__ >>> || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche >>> ||=====| www.macads.co.uk/snaps >>> _____________________________ >>> Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=====| www.macads.co.uk/snaps _____________________________
