frank theriault wrote: > I use photo.net. 100 free photo uploads, no size restriction > that I'm aware of, critique requests available, lots of > forums to participate in (which I don't, 'cause with PDML, > who has time), lots of interesting articles and columns and opinions. > > For I think $25 US a year, you can become a member, and have > unlimited photo uploads. > > You can organize your photos into folders, which I like (I > keep a separate one for all my PAWs). > > What I don't like is that lately, their site has been down > for days at a time. Hasn't happened for a couple of months > now (they seemed to be having problems back then, but they > seem solved now). Also, they can be a bit slow to get into > at times; maybe it's a traffic thing, I don't know. > > Other than the last thing, they're pretty good, and I would > recommend them; a fine photographic resource.
I use photo.net. I agree that sometimes you cannot access the site for extended periods and on occasion I have had difficulty downloading photos to the site, but as a 'free' user, I have to say overall I like them, and the advantages outweigh any hassle. Malcolm
