> Here we go again... Do you feel like sharing the reasons *why* you don't
> like it, or what about it disappoints you, or are you satisfied with
> coming across as a teenage flamer? As your post stands now, it's not very
> useful to anyone thinking of buying an MZ-S.
>
> chris
>
I just want to say that the MZ-S is not the SLR I am stilll waiting for.
I hope, even as the same cost, a body bettre than a Nikon F-100 or a EOS 3.
Why ? I will answer "Why not !" (I o not want to say "for Pentax sake")
I really prefer Pentax making better SLR that nowadays.
But, I also understand that they may not wish to make such a SLR, because it
does not fit the Pentax Traditional way of making SLR.
Well, as far as I know, the Maxxum 7 is really good SLR and I am very
waiting for a Pentax SLR better than the Minolta one.
I really understand people who are going to buy it, and I will not say that
this is a mistake as far as it is really what each one wish. But I know now
that this is not the SLR I wish to buy (except as the same price as a Nikon
N80 because in this case, this means I encurage Pentax to sells its stuff as
low price as it is possible)
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
