Hello Shel, Yeah, quite a difference in the conversions. After looking at them, somehow the strong colors seem to add to the picture for me. The B&W is good, but like I said, you rarely see something like this in color. The color of the clothing and building really work well here. Usually There is too much in the clothing and buildings are too pastel - almost like it was hand tinted.
-- Best regards, Bruce Thursday, May 27, 2004, 12:17:33 PM, you wrote: SB> Hi Bruce ... SB> I was going to convert to B&W ... it actually looked pretty good with a SB> simple greyscal flip in PS - but decided to get some feedback, see if SB> anyone cared for the colors. I usually "see" in B&W, and am often SB> distracted by color, or am not the best judge of its use in photographs. SB> The top one's my first choice as well. SB> Here's the same photo in color and with two conversion techniques. The SB> conversions were just quickies, but the differences are pretty clear. SB> http://home.earthlink.net/~digisnaps/outside-conv.html SB> Thanks for taking time to comment. SB> Shel Belinkoff >> [Original Message] >> From: Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: 5/27/2004 11:26:49 AM >> Subject: Re: Outside the Shattuck Theater in Berkeley >> >> Shel, >> >> I really like this - especially the top one. There is a kind of >> rough, raw look that I don't see very often. It is a kind of shot >> that is typically shot in B&W. However, the colors work quite well >> here. You certainly have a great eye for this type of work. >> >> Keep it up and keep sharing please. >> >> Thanks, >> >> SB> http://home.earthlink.net/~digisnaps/outside.html
