Numerous people have complained that Nikon scanning software isn't very good. Many people have raved about Vuescan. Several times I've wondered what it is about Nikon software that people dislike. I've only used it, and only about thirty times over the past couple of years. It seems OK to me, as do the results. I've never used Vuescan. I'm ignorant about the differences in practical application, and what to expect in the way of results.
Now that I'll soon have my very Coolscan film scanner, these questions have more significance. So, what is it about Nikon software that you don't like? In what way is Vuescan better? I've downloaded the Vuescan "Getting Started" guide and can see some features that Nikonscan doesn't have (at least not that I know of), but features "don't mean squat" unless they work well. Therefore, any comments from experienced users of both software packages would be appreciated, especially concerning the newest versions of each. Thanks! Shel Belinkoff
