Perhaps Pentax need to do an IR scan of the sensor surface and try to do some ICE work - LOL!
Man, that would be cool though... > -----Original Message----- > From: Bruce Dayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 08 June 2004 20:14 > To: Shawn K. > Subject: Re[2]: Samples from DA14/2.8! > > > Yeah, it is a bit like the nasty problem that > negatives/slides have of getting/being scratched and > collecting dust. After having scanned about a thousand > rolls, I can tell you that the dust on the sensor feels like > a bit less of a problem than the film damage. Both have to > be dealt with if/when they occur. It certainly pays to be > aware of the potential problem though. > > -- > Best regards, > Bruce > > > Tuesday, June 8, 2004, 10:52:45 AM, you wrote: > > SK> In the second photo of the city, there is a spot in the > sky, looks > SK> like a spec of something was on the sensor. I find it Ironic, > SK> considering that many people ahve complained about dust > collecting > SK> on the istD's sensor. I guess its a problem with most DSLR's > SK> though. > > SK> -Shawn > > SK> -----Original Message----- > SK> From: Rob Studdert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > SK> Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 8:49 AM > SK> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > SK> Subject: Re: Samples from DA14/2.8! > > > SK> On 8 Jun 2004 at 14:07, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote: > > >> They are already here: > >> http://www.digital.pentax.co.jp/ja/35mm/ist-d/ex.html > > SK> Considering it's a dedicated digital only lens I'm quite > surprised > SK> that the chromatic aberrations are still not great at the > edges and > SK> both images were shot at f8. > > > SK> Rob Studdert > SK> HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > SK> Tel +61-2-9554-4110 > SK> UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > SK> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > SK> http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ > SK> Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 > > >
