OTOH, I was using 100 speed film Friday around PDML (M100/2.8, 1/15sec at 2.8). Only about 3 (out of 10-12) of the shots came out sharp enough in 4x6 prints. I had a monopod in the truck, so who's fault is that?
--
Cotty wrote:
On 6/6/04, GRAYWOLF, discombobulated, offered:
I wonder if the folks who think IS is so wonderful have actually used it?
Today at GFM Cotty was showing off his new Canon 70-200 IS. I noticed that it took something like a second for it to kick in. I think it would occasionally
be a
life saver and 99% of the time drive me crazy. But then I feel like that
about a lot of the must-have-super-duper-high-buck-features most of the folk here
think are absolutely essential for taking photos.
Hi mate,
just going through the backlog of PDML messages, chronologically...
When I was showing you, I should have also included the 2X (which was still in Bill's camper) - the effect is much more pronounced.
I can see a beautiful relationship kicking off here - and I don't just mean me and you, buddy ;-)
Cheers, Cotty
___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=====| www.macads.co.uk/snaps _____________________________
-- graywolf http://graywolfphoto.com/graywolf.html
