Perhaps I should clarify. By "soft" I did not mean less sharp, but the "milky" appearance. I don't know the proper way/word to describe it though. :-(

Regards,
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan

Wide opened, the 77 beats my 85/1.8D, and overall the 77 has more '3D'
look than the Nikon. So the 77 is harsh for portrait, but superb in
general.

Andy Chang took me to a Pentax store in Taipei (thanks Andy!!!) and I
got a 50/1.4 FA. After some testing, I must say this is one sharp lens
(just like other normal primes), but never softer than Nikon's 50/1.4
(mine is AIS).

They are sharp & contrasty by Pentax standard, but still on the "soft"
side when compared to Nikkors, never harsh.

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Premium: Up to 11 personalized e-mail addresses and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines




Reply via email to