On 16 Jun 2004 at 14:57, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:

> Interesting comparison - analog *ist vs *istD for these, who would like to
> print directly from digital :-) Oh, and Herbert has bought *istD too ;-)
> http://popphoto.com/article.asp?print_page=y&section_id=2&article_id=964&pag
> e_number=1&preview=

I wonder if he has learned to use it properly yet? I found it amazing that he 
compared colour casts between the film and digital prints when he had knowingly 
set the *ist D to AWB. Secondly his latitude comparison would have been a 
little more realistic if he had set the *ist D to closer match the film ie 
contrast setting to minimum. And does the Fisheye Zoom lens zoom from fisheye 
projection  to "straight-line" (rectilinear) projection as he suggests?

Go Herbert.


Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998

Reply via email to