On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, graywolf wrote: > One of the strange things I have noticed is that some how the idea that the K > lenses were a bit better than the M lenses, has somehow become they are a lot > better. Exaggeration by people who go by what they read somewhere rather than > their own experience I figure.
In my case, it's just fetish. If I can get a K lens, I 'll get it. They are the worse to own, as their FL is behind the cap, unlike all others K-mount lenses, but still, there is something about them. I could trade in my K135/3.5 at a small profit (though still peanuts) when I bought the 2.5. It is the worse of the options, slower than the 2.5 and heavier than the M. Did I sell it? Did I f. Kostas
