Hi, Boris.
 
 I don't mind the old man and the dog being small in the 
 image. There's no law saying that the main subject should be 
 any larger than what's possible to discern from film grain! 
 The question is whether they fill their role in the motif.
 
 I think they do.
 
 Your suggested title is "Old man, his dog and the city", and 
 the filename is "watching the city grow". I think it's 
 interesting that you leave the third element in the picture 
 unmentioned; the trees that actually makes up the foreground. 
 It builds a little puzzle, which I like. I think I like the 
 filename even better for a title, because it leaves the question open on 
 who or what is actually watching the city grow; trees or people?
 
 If you want to emphasise the man and dog's role, I suggest a 
 crop. As it stands, all the action is in the lower half of 
 the image. IMO, you don't need the whole tree to make the frame 
 around the city, man and dog either. I'm not going to suggest 
 a specific crop, though, unless you want specific input. Play 
 around...:-)
 
 Cheers,
 Jostein

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boris Liberman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 10:13 PM
> To: PDML
> Subject: PAW: at long last
> 
> 
> Hi!
> 
> I think I have a PAW now. Slowly getting out of my dry period.
> 
> Here goes:
> ME Super (seems the shutter is faulty again <sigh>), M 35/2.8 at f/8,
> Kodak TMAX 400 scanned at 1200 dpi with my Epson 2450. City of
> Jerusalem...
> 
> I think I'd call it "Old man, his dog and the city"...
> 
> Your comments are most welcome.
> 
> Boris
> 
> P.S. And the link is...
> http://boris.isra-shop.com/local/paw/watching-the-city-grow.jpg
> 





----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

Reply via email to