On 10 Jul 2004 at 22:07, Jim Colwell wrote: > frank, > > I'm new to PDML, but I've been on the www since it was a DARPA project in > the 1970's. There are many sites with office sex pics, but I don't think > that PDML should be one, nor (I suspect) do about 51% of the potential PDML > audience.
> P.S. I know that the content of your pics does not match the label, but that is > not the point... It is just a label, we are a fairly conservative lot on list, if there is ever any doubt as to suitability generally a warning will be given. For instance I posted a close up portrait of a snake a couple of months back, I made sure that those who might have a problem knew what they were in for. We know the type of material Frank post and I don't think I've ever seen anything from him on list that I wouldn't give a "G" rating to. Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
