On 12 Jul 2004 at 20:29, Jon M wrote: > What I've given particular attention to is the LX > (nice, very nice... but expensive), the K2DMD > (seemingly uncommon, expensive compared to a regular > K2), and the Super Program / Super A (common, cheap, > lacks MLU and DOF preview). > > Anybody that's used any or all have any remarks about > these, especially comparatively? Reading > specifications only goes so far.
Given your selection criterion I expect the LX is really your best option, it has all the facilities you require and a great build. The K2DMD is reportedly a great body but you've less chance getting it repaired than an LX and it will likely be more expensive as there are LX bargains to be had now. The Super Program / Super A aren't in the same league. Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
