I always thought that Pentax missed the boat somehow with the Super A/Super program although it was a very successfull camera. When it came out I was a devoted MX user - and I immediately liked the LCD display in the Super A finder ... until I discovered that it did not provide the information it promised: no aperture readout in aperture priority or in Manual - combined with a DOF lever that *only* works correctly in aperture priority / manual. I always thought when setting out to design a new lens line they should have gone he whole way and invent something that provides all the information - always. It is still a nice camera, though.
Sven -----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- Von: Jon M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. Juli 2004 18:27 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: LX vs K2dmd vs Super Program > BTW why not an MZ-S ?? I've not seen any used ones around (haven't looked much on ebay tho), and new ones are $770 from KEH, whereas they regularly have the LX for $350... but even that is pushing it. > Jon, I think the only way you can make a decision is to go to a camera shop and play with these cameras. Do you have one near you? Everyone's preferences are different. None of the shops around here have anything more than the more common cameras. (ME, K1000, etc) Does KEH have a retail storefront, or are they phone & internet order only? I'm about 2.5 to 3 hours driving distance from Atlanta. I really think I'd like the LX, but I'm scared I'll spend $350-$500 on a camera body that will need $200 worth of repairs in six months. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
