One thing I like about the black and white one though, is if I stare long
enough at the crown, I can almost see it in colour. I suppose one thing
which makes me like the colour one is the fact that it was the original one.
I think I have yet to get myself 100% comfortable with digitally reworking
photographs.

I think it's similar to when people prefer film produced photos to digital
just because digital is 1s and 0s. In which case, if you produced a print
from a digital image, and you couldn't tell the difference, which basket
would that sit in..

Regards,
Ryan


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ryan Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 2:11 AM
Subject: Re: August PUG comments


> Hello Ryan,
>
> I actually prefer the B&W version.  Thanks for showing the original
> for comparison.
>
> Bruce
>
>
> Tuesday, July 27, 2004, 5:08:25 AM, you wrote:
>
> RL> Hi Henk,
>
> RL> Thanks for taking the time to comment on the PUG. I've seen the thumbs
and
> RL> think we've got a great gallery this month, but haven't had the time
to
> RL> browse each contribution yet. Regarding my shot, I think I prefer the
> RL> original coloured version. I don't think my PS desaturation seems to
get the
> RL> same effect as a good black and white film, but I'm not sure it I'm
just
> RL> being paranoid.. Anyway, here's something for ya:
> RL> http://home.iprimus.com.au/heygoose/draco2.jpg
>
> RL> Cheers,
> RL> Ryan
>
>
> RL> ----- Original Message ----- 
> RL> From: "Henk Terhell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> RL> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> RL> Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 9:32 PM
> RL> Subject: August PUG comments
>
>
> >> King Draco: nice shot but I do miss the colours here.
>
>
>
>


Reply via email to