----- Original Message ----- 
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: 35 v. MF v. LF (was Film vs Digita)


> Biggest problem with P67 is it is too heavy to carry in
> field with several lenses. The rest of my post
> stated that LF equipment is lighter and cheaper than
> P67 and with better results. For LANDSCAPES, LF is the way to go
IMHO,
> for some
> other stuff (more general?) the P67 is better but
> we were talking about landscapes only.

Again, this presumes that you are limiting the number of film holders
you are carrying to just a very few, or are going to the added
expense and limited film choices available in Readyload.
If you need to carry enough holders loaded for a days shooting, 4x5
is no longer lighter or smaller.

William Robb


Reply via email to