I particularly like pots.jpg but it's obvious that those digital cameras are
crappy for portraiture. In hat1.jpg it made your model appear totally
lifeless with no vitality whatsoever.
Tom C.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brewer, Doug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pdml (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 11:25 AM
Subject: Fun with Artifacts
> Just thought I'd throw out a couple links to some work I've been doing
here
> at the museum. Mostly what I do is record-keeping images, but there's no
law
> that says they must be totally boring, so I've been having a little fun
here
> and there.
>
> Anyway, here are a few samples:
>
> http://www.alphoto.com/hat1.jpg
>
> http://www.alphoto.com/powderhorns1.jpg
>
> http://www.alphoto.com/pot.jpg
>
> http://www.alphoto.com/pots.jpg
>
> http://www.alphoto.com/rifle1.jpg
>
>
> All of these shots were done with an Olympus C-3030 digicam (!), and to
> stretch this to make it somewhat related to Pentax photography, many of
> these shots have been repeated on film using my Pentax cameras and lenses.
>
> Have fun,
>
> Doug
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
>
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
