Two votes for an MX viewfinder (including Alex's).. Maybe I'll try scouting used equipment just for a look and a play.
>You would > immediately sell the camera, and never take another photo for the rest of your life. I hope you don't mean that.. The way it's phrased makes it sound like the MX would spoil photography for me :) > Consider what your mythical newbie would be comparing the viewfinder too? Then > you may want rethink your scenario. And about comparing the viewfinder to say a point and shoot, the mz50's viewfinder wasn't too much better. The sample I got to play with had black specks thru the viewfinder too. I know it doesn't affect the image, but is it cleanable? Cheers, Ryan ----- Original Message ----- From: "graywolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 1:31 AM Subject: Re: MZ50 (or maybe 60) vs MZ5n viewfinder > GRIN! > > You do not want to compare that 5n's viewfinder to a clean MX's. You would > immediately sell the camera, and never take another photo for the rest of your life. > > Consider what your mythical newbie would be comparing the viewfinder too? Then > you may want rethink your scenario. > > -- > > Ryan Lee wrote: > > > Anyway, I just had the horrible thought that maybe some newbie slightly > > interested in photography might pick up a relatively cheap body like a 50, > > and because of the less than satisfactory viewfinder, not get as into > > photography as he/she could have been otherwise. > > > -- > graywolf > http://graywolfphoto.com/graywolf.html > > >
