Aw come on Tom, that'll only add a couple dozen pages! ;-) Think mini-mall, not mini-skirt. Mini is a relative term, no?
Seriously though, we newcomers to the list NEED the repetition so we can add our own opinions/questions/comments. Plus technology changes so fast that I find the very same question asked about computers can have a new answer about every week, are cameras, accessories and techniques so different? Don -----Original message----- From: graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 08:46:37 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: cliches (was Re: UV filters on sexy lenses) > What part of "mini", didn't you understand. There are photographic encyclopedias > out there with all that information in them. > > -- > > Derby Chang wrote: > > > > > Frantisek Vlcek wrote: > > > >> OMG! This 'discussion' again. It's nothing more than a filler. Could > >> this topic be added to the PDML mini-FAQ ;-) ? Like: > > > > > > > > > > Actually, Frantisek has a good point...graywolf, would you consider > > adding a cliche discussion list to your FAQ? To Frantisek's, I'd add: > > > > zooms v primes > > AF v MF > > autoexposure v what it says on the inside of the kodak box > > plastic v metal > > diffusion v condenser enlargers (or fibre v RC, or glass v glassless > > carriers, and other cutting edge technologies) > > which local pentax distributor is crappeir > > > > > > ..needless to say....this is mostly :) But on the other hand, I like the > > occasional cliche discussion - its like listening to the Eroica one more > > time. I never really get tired of it (as long as there is other chatter > > in between). > > > > Obviously I'm a bit bored tonight while my scanner sloooowly scans these > > negs. > > > > D > > > > -- > graywolf > http://graywolfphoto.com/graywolf.html > >
