I guess you have to decide for yourself if its the destination (images) or the trip (gear & usage of that gear). For my outdoor photography its both. I truly enjoy going to the places that I photograph & bringing back images of that experience is the icing on the cake. But in places like Katmai N.P. the experience of being there observing those magnificant brown bears is just incrediable. The fact that I've captured images of the experience is almost secondary. Having said all that I do find that I will shoot as much as it takes. That doesn't mean I don't spend time waiting, seeing & composing.
-----Original Message----- From: Don Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Intentional Photography? Truly excellent article, I've printed it out and put it on the end table with my photography books. I often decide my photos would be better with a newer/fancier piece of gear. Maybe this article and the MX will help squelch that idea when it pops up. Don > -----Original Message----- > From: graywolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 3:31 PM > To: Pentax Discussion Malling List > Subject: Intentional Photography? > > > From time to time we talk about, serious photography vs. > snapshots here on the > list. I came across a link to the following article by Bruce > wilson on APUG.org. > I think he says it very well. > > http://wilson.dynu.net/dilution.asp > > -- > graywolf > http://graywolfphoto.com/graywolf.html > > ________________________________________ PeoplePC Online A better way to Internet http://www.peoplepc.com
