For my sins, I lurk on another list (a pale ghost of this one it has to
be said) and saw a very interesting post that raised my awareness about
batteries. It may or may not be true, but here is food for thought. The
thread originated from someone enquiring if anyone had had problems using
3rd party (and much cheaper) batteries in EOS DSLRs. For those that don't
know, they use proprietary Lithium Ion units that Canon sells, at
extortionate rates. *ist D owners will revel in their ability to use off-
the-counter AAs after reading this!

--------------------


>Is there any reason *not* to use generic BP-511 li-ion batteries in a Canon
>10D? I see 1600mAh capacity ones there for less than $10.

Many companies these days use questionable and I think downright
unethical practices with regards to their products.  Cell phones are the
first to come to mind.   They warn you that using third party batteries
is dangerous because they might be of inferior quality, leak, or
explode.  What they don't tell you is that the phone cryptographically
queries the battery to find out if it is an official (from the same
phone company) battery, and if it isn't then the phone changes its power
consumption profile to specifically damage the battery.  I can't,
strangely, find a reference to back this claim up however, because there
are so many web pages that hit when I search for it.  I can however
easily find sources for my next example.

Printers also cryptgraphically authenticate their toner cartridges,
forcing the consumer to use expensive versions from the manufacturer
instead of cheaper versions available from the "free market".  The
easiest example is Lexmark versus Static Control, available at
http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/archives/000305.html.  Static Control
was found to have violated copyright laws and the DMCA (twice) by
copying the Lexmark cryptographic program into their own toner
cartridges to allow their cartidges to be used in Lexmark printers.

On this list I've seen people theorize that Canon goes out of its way to
make Tamron and Sigma lenses incompatable with the new versions of
cameras.  They might.  Given how unethical the Digital Rebel is (look at
the Russian firmware hacks to see how easy it was to activate
the functionality in the 300D that is merely turned off by a simple
flag) and it might make you wonder about Canons attitude towards
consumers.  The Digital Rebel, deep down, is a full blown 10D with a
cheap plastic shell and fewer buttons, with quite a bit of functionality
compiled in and merely turned off.

The Canon battery has four pins on it.  One labeled +, one labeled -,
one labeled B, and one labeled D.  That is one more pin than they need
to implement a serial interface to the battery.  There is more than
enough room in there for a microprocessor that could authenticate itself
upwards to the camera.  I haven't opened a battery up to see what is
inside it, and I can't find a website that talks about it, so we really
don't know.

A Canon camera could, either now or something in the future, decide to
maliciously attack a non-Canon battery placed inside it.

Years ago I new a man who kept his television in a back room down some
steps.  The television faced away from the door towards a couch with a
featureless wall behind it.  The television was chained and padlocked to
the floor, and the man never sat in front of the television or ever
watched it.  He chained it down so that it couldn't "walk around the
house at night and look at things".  If you pointed out that he could
just not own a television his reply was "But then they might suspect."

I'm looking forward to buying a new washing machine.  One of the
machines I looked at touts its advanced features and tells you they
improve its washing.  It can detect the dirt and soap in the water, to
precisely control the washing environment.  It can also supposedly
detect what clothes you are washing to customize and tune their washing
to get them the cleanest possible.  Wow, that all sounds great.  And it
also wants you to plug a phone line into the back of the washing machine
so that it can receive updates from the manufacturer to improve your
washing experience.  My immediate thought was that, deep down, I really
don't want my washing machine calling up some corporation to tell them
details of when I wash, how frequently I wash, how dirty my clothes are,
and possibly even what clothes I wash (I got the impression it could tell
colors from whites which means it has a camera hidden somewhere).

Today we live in an age when lots of things monitor you.  There are
trash cans that scan the UPC codes of your trash as you throw it away,
cars that not only track your location and send stealth uplinks back to
the company (although the Supreme Court has currently forbid this due to
the implementation disabling a safety feature you can expect it will be
reworked and will secretly reappear), cell phones that track you via GPS
and silently update your location via the cell network, and even cars
that monitor your mood themselves and will photograph you on its own
(without outside human interaction) if it thinks a photograph will be
appropriate. Corporations are fighting tooth and nail to prevent losing
money to competitors, and the DMCA is a valuable tool against the free
market for them.

I trust Canon to work well with its own products, and the Digital Rebel
has shown me that they really don't have anything but their own selfish
intrests in mind.  I would not be suprised if Canon queried its battery
to find out what kind it is, and I wouldn't be suprised if they tried to
cause problems for competing batteries inside their camera.  I currently
don't they do, or else it would already be known about, but I think it
is the trend in business and the day will come when it will happen.
I'll stick with official batteries myself.

This got a lot more Corporate/Political than I really intended, but I
think it is still on topic.

- -- void *(*(*schlake(void *))[])(void *); /* http://www.nmt.edu/~schlake/ */



-----------------------------------------




Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)   |     People, Places, Pastiche
||=====|    www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_____________________________


Reply via email to