We are talking optical not mechanical design here arent we? What does the mount have to do with it. You certainly don't think that the mount has anything to do with my comments do you?
-----Original Message----- From: Rob Studdert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 9:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 50 or 100 mm On 10 Aug 2004 at 7:43, William Robb wrote: > Not withstanding, the macro lenses with the fixed rear element design > are incredibly good lenses. I recall reading in the literature of the > day when I bought the A100mm f/2.8 macro that the design allowed for > superior lens performance throughout the focal range. > As the lens is excruciatingly sharp from 1:1 right through to > infinity (no small feat), there is absolutely nothing wrong with the > lens design. You are kidding? It's not screw mount. LOL Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
