--- Ann Sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
> Sigh...
> In the middle of the night I was wakeful and
> turned on my bedside radio to
> NPR - the replay of Leonard Lopate's inerview with
> Clifford Ross was on.
> This morning, a friend sends me the link to the
> site showing the photo.
> 
> It pisses me off.
> This guy took a year to make this kinda pretty but
> rather ordinary postcard photo
> a 5 x 10 foot print?  
> (1) Looks better to me with a good chunk trimmed
> off the bottom
> (2) surely the mountain has a name.  Couldn't he
> tell us what it is and where
>     the photo was taken? (my first guess, not
> doing and research really
>     was Mt. Shasta.
> (3) Ross stresses that he is doing this for art's
> sake - yet to me it is
>     mainly a technical tour de force.  
> 
> Anyone else have a simliar reaction?  (Or the
> oppoiste?) 
> 
> http://www.cliffordross.com/R1/R1-image.html


I'll tell you what pisses me off.  I'm trying to be
all sulky and "take a break", then I come back to
maybe lurk for a bit, and Ann posts this thing that I
can't ~possibly~ ignore!  How can I not respond?!? 
<vbg>

Okay, so first of all, who cares if it's art?  Art is
so ephemeral, and means so many different things to so
many people, it's so subjective, that the question in
and of itself is meaningless, in my not so humble
opinion.

I don't pretend to know what art is.  I admit that it
exists.  It's one of those things that reminds me of
the US legislator who was asked to define
"pornography":  "I can't define it, but I know it when
I see it."  Art's sort of like that.  I know it when I
see it.  Sometimes I don't know it at first, and after
someone who purports to know explains it to me, I
grudgingly admit that something's art.

Sometimes I just don't get it, and no amount of
explanation can convince me that something's art. 
Like the Poop Machine.  I think it's by a French
"artist" (certainly European).  It's a machine into
which food is fed at one end, the human digestive
process is more or less replicated (as best as is
possible), and poo comes out the other end.  It's
brown, has the consistency of poo, and it smells like
poo (or so the TV commentator told me - I'll have to
take his word on that one...).  I have trouble
thinking of that as art.

But, I digress...

I think Amita is right.  It's hard to consider the
"artfulness" of this one unless it's seen in the
context in which it was intended:  a big giant
freaking huge print.  

At the Art Gallery of Ontario a year or two ago, the
most banal snapshots were blown up huge on positive
glass transparencies, then backlit.  I had trouble
thinking that was art, but it was in an Art Gallery,
so...

Anyway, as a landscape, this one's okay, but only.  Is
it me, or is it tilted?  (asks the man who
specializes, it seems, in tilted photos <g>)  Or,
maybe the foothills tilt to the right.  I find it very
unsettling.

I regularly see landscapes here as PAWs or PUGs that
blow this one out of the water, at least on a computer
screen.  Mark Roberts, Ken Waller, Mark Cassino and
many more (sorry if I forgot a few, there are more) do
stuff that interests me much much more than this.

As (I think) Keith said, it's a technical tour de
force, to be sure.  It's not one of those that I look
at and immediately say, "Hey, that's nice art."

I ~do~ (based on what little I've seen and read) think
that this guy's a pretentious artsy weinie.  Something
about people who allow themselves to be photographed
while they work - as if they're so important.  I'm
also not real big on process - and this seems to be
all about process - I'm big on the finished product
(which we don't really see anyway).  The whole
"process is important" thing seems somewhat
self-important, too.  I mean, tell us about your
equipment and technique, your self-imposed rules, but
don't make it part of the exhibit, thank you very
much.

Crap.  See what happens?  I don't post for a few days,
and I can't stop typing.  

Okay, I'll go away now (right after I tell Mark how
much his motorcycle piccies blew me away).

cheers,
frank



=====
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds.  The pessimist fears it 
is true."  -J. Robert Oppenheimer

______________________________________________________________________ 
Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca

Reply via email to