That equipment would work for a freelance photojournalist, or wedding photographer. It would be totally inadequate for most other professional photography. It is not as bad nowadays as it was back when a pro needed to have the "Holy-Trinity of the Professional Photographer" (35mm, 120, and 4x5). But still a studio photographer doing advertising (the most profitable type of work) plus whatever else was available will need a lot more equipment than you are thinking of. I figured that to open a studio back in the 1960's I would need about that $25,000 you mention just for camera equipment. Nowadays you would probably be looking at $100,000+. In fact you probably would be putting $25,000 into lighting equipment for serious advertising work.

The above is why "Thomas Arthur Rittenhouse, Photography for Advertising and Illustration" never happened.

However, for serious freelance wedding photography and location portraiture you probably can set up from scratch today for $10,000 or so (TV can tell you how close I am on that figure). I had about $5000 invested in that back in the 80"s. I found I hated doing weddings and moved over to doing what I called "Commercial Snapshots" for builders, businesses, and others who need a photographic record of things. Having a BBC (Big Black Camera) helps a lot in that type of work. Much of the work was rather ho-hum. The work I made the most money (profit) from was on location photo ID badges with a Polaroid ID Machine which does nothing for ones ego.

--

Jens Bladt wrote:

In Denmark there's a rule of thumb, saying that is will cost one million
kroner to create one job.
1 mio kroner is appr. 167.000 USD.

Having done a few rough calculations about what is needed to be a
professional photographer (office/lab space including furniture etc., a
camera and lenses etc., computer/printer/scanner equipment, marketing/adds,
transportation (a car) etc.) I guess there would be room for perhaps
25-35.000 USD for the camera equipment.
25.000 USD will buy:

What would you be looking for, what would you buy?


I would probably be looking for:

2 digital bodies (3-14 MP0), including battery grips etc.
Dedicated lenses:
2-3 zooms f2.8 throughout
3-5 primes f2.8 or better
Tele converter, perhaps a macro converter
Filters, like polarizer and misc. effects (Cokin)
A dedicated flash GN 135 (45)
2-4 RAM cards
Portable hard drive/card reader
Tripod and monopod

And probably some IS equipment or avialable light/evening shots

Which brand would you go for ?

Jens







Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt


-----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 15. august 2004 11:24 Til: pentax list Emne: Re: Lessons fro a pro


On 14/8/04, William Robb, discombobulated, offered:


This is the webpage to learn from for all you guys who insist on
thinking your 50mm lens is really a 75mm lens.

http://www.proshooter.homestead.com/untitled1.html


ROTL!!




Cheers, Cotty


___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=====| www.macads.co.uk/snaps _____________________________






-- graywolf http://graywolfphoto.com/graywolf.html




Reply via email to