As I think further about it... if the same bouquet was viewed entirely through a rainspotted wrapper...as in lay flat rainspotted wrapper across the top of the bouquet... that might be very very nice...

Tom C. (taking a break from abusing Antonio)





From: Ann Sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PAW - rainydaybouquet
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 16:50:04 -0400

Tom C wrote:
>
> I like it Ann. The purist in me does not like the plastic wrapper. OTOH,
> it has a lacelike effect which complements the flowers.
>
> I'd probably like to see a little more of the wrapper... it depends if you
> intended to convey that this was an arranged boquet or purely flowers.
>
> Pretty.
>
> Tom C.


Thanks, Tom!
At first, I had more wrapper in it - I cropped  -
the raindrops on the plastic actually
are what drew me to this particular arrangement.
But the full frame shot had some distracting
background stuff - once I cropped
I decided I liked it this way but I could have
done some other stuff
 - just didnt want too fiddle too much.

I'm having fun with the digicam but there are some
difficult things about it.

ann


> > >From: Ann Sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: PAW - rainydaybouquet > >Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 18:42:42 -0400 > > > >with the Canon Powershot A80 > >early attempt with the digi cam > > > >I think the setting on this was 1/250, no flash > >and as if it were ISO 400 > >But I changed cards and I think I also erased the > >first one I used so > >I'm not sure what I did . > > > >But I did notice that when I saved this to jpg it > >came up as sRGB color space > >instead of Adobe 1998 - even though that is the > >way my PHotoshop elements is set > >on my computer. > > > >anyway - go at it, guys I really don't know what > >I'm doing here yet > > > >annsan > > > >http://users.rcn.com/annsan/rainydaybouquet > > > >p.s. I cropped but did not futz with it much in > >photoshop -- just a bit less bright, > >a tad more contrast > >





Reply via email to