Not that big a deal Cotty, it's also called a "semi-silvered" mirror. Lets some light thru, reflects some. A lot like the "one way" mirrors you've seen. Here's a page on the Canon F-1 that shows some advantages and disadvantages: http://www.cameraquest.com/f1high.htm
Here's one from Edmund that shows a Pellicle "beam splitter", works the same but has superior qualities. http://www.edmundoptics.com/onlinecatalog/displayproduct.cfm?productid=2044& CFID=1941248&CFTOKEN=ba8b82d60fb65f7d-6C95818C-3048-41AD-8422E529AC5CC370 Sorry about the long URL, you'll have to copy and paste it. Don > -----Original Message----- > From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 6:49 AM > To: pentax list > Subject: Pellicle Mirrors (was: Re: Prosumer vs. DSLR (was Re: two new > digicams...) > > > On 17/8/04, fra, discombobulated, offered: > > >I am more thinking that with increasing sensor sensitivity, we could > >see a pellicle mirror DSLR. Imagine it - very fast, very quiet, no > >dust on the sensor,... Is it possible to have AF in pellicle mirrror > >one? Where would be the sensors? > > Can anyone recommend an easy to understand web page that explains how a > pellicle mirror system works, so a thicko like me can get my > noggin around it? > > > > Cheers, > Cotty > > > ___/\__ > || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche > ||=====| www.macads.co.uk/snaps > _____________________________ > >

