I've use A & F lenses, but not the FA, so I'll compare to the F. Color correction between the two is very similar.
The 43 is not a significant improvement. The barrel problem makes it less desirable, though that depends on what you shoot & at what distances & at what f-stops. These results can affect your decision and so a test is in order to compare images. I shot some coke cans close-up and found no issues, liking the 43 in that regard. Might be nice for portraits. But I also shot some trees from a ways off and, though contrast and colors were outstanding, the barrel issues made for a non-linear image. For general use I'd recommend you get the F or FA50/1.4 or 1.7 and couple it with the FA35/2. You'll be much better off in the long run. The Fs are ugly but that makes them cheaper, allowing you to get the FA35/2. (I really, really like my A35/2, so the K30/2.8 is FS on eBay via dpconsult.com) I shoot manual focus only and alternate between manual- and auto-exposure solutions. Sincerely, C. Brendemuehl ------------------------------------- 'Every individual is continually exerting himself to find out the most advantageous employment for whatever capital he can command. It is his own advantage, indeed, and not that of the society, which he has in view. But the study of his own advantage naturally, or rather necessarily, leads him to prefer that employment which is most advantageous to the society.' --- Adam Smith, 'The Wealth of Nations' _______________________________________________ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web!
