Maybe it's like the IT industry, it just gets better and cheaper but I doubt it. Chassis may not be the only area where the quality differs, I've never handled a MZ-6 so I'm not in a position to say.
You've got me curious now, OH NO! NOT ANOTHER CAMERA John ---------- Original Message ----------- From: "David Madsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 10:32:10 -0600 Subject: RE: MZ-6? > Actually I believe the chassis is identical. The MZ-6 is compatible > with the high speed features of the 360fgz. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Toralf Lund [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2004 9:19 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: MZ-6? > > John Whittingham wrote: > > >Build quality?! > > > > > Quite possibly. > > Actually, now that you mention it, I noticed that the MZ-6 is > slightly lighter than the MZ-5n even though it's also somewhat > larger - if the figures on Bojdar Dimitrov's page are correct - so > maybe it's likely to be less solidly built. > > >John > >---------- Original Message ----------- > >From: Toralf Lund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: pdml <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Sent: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 16:23:40 +0200 > >Subject: MZ-6? > > > > > > > >>What are you people's opinion on the MZ-6? I found a new one with a > >>much-reduced price, so I'm a bit tempted... Seems to me that it's > >>rather similar to the MZ-5n, but its list price is lower, so there > >>must be something "missing", but what exactly is it? Actually, based > >>on the specs, it looks like the MZ-6 has something to offer that the > >>MZ-5n hasn't, in terms of program modes (not that I'm too interested > >>in those, but still...) > >> > >>- Toralf > >> > >> > >------- End of Original Message ------- > > > > > > ------- End of Original Message -------
