On 23/8/04, Caveman, discombobulated, unleashed: >Shel Belinkoff wrote: >> However, the average amateur photographer does not get so deep into the >> details. S/he points, s/he shoots, and then passes the film off to the lab. > >I beg to differ. He passes no film to anyone. He just plugs an USB cable >into the camera. How to develop film is completely irrelevant for him. > >Sorry but these are the days now. > >cheers, >digicaveman
Actually Cavo the digitographer has a point. Perhaps because processing digital images is bound to become more prevalent than traditional wet darkroom technique - due to availability of computers etc - then more and more people *will* get into the whole process in a more hands-on way than previously...... Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=====| www.macads.co.uk/snaps _____________________________
