-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 3:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: It's over (was Re: Ilford in trouble? and digi snappers)
Billy Abbott wrote: > On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, J. C. O'Connell wrote: > >> 35mm Film is EASIER than digital, that's why a lot of people still >> use 35mm. Take the pix with autoeverything camera, drop off the film, >> get a bag full of prints. > > > Or take your digital P&S, review the pictures on the screen on the > back, deleted the ones you don't like and then drop off the memory > card and get back a bag full of prints that you have chosen out of the > ones that you took. Yep. That means that digital can be just as simple as film, but the standard argument that says it's simpler still doesn't hold. ====================================================================== Are you guys serious?, anyone can see, even by your own descriptions of the process, that there are less steps and skills required to do 35mm film than digital. That is simplicity. Your wrong digital is not simpler or AS SIMPLE as 35mm film from a user standpoint. JCO
